On March 15, 1965 (8 days after the first attempt to march
from Selma to Montgomery was marred by violence committed by law enforcement
officials). President Johnson addressed a joint session of Congress to urge the passage of legislation guaranteeing voting rights for all. The act was finally signed into law on August 6, 1965.
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/johnson-calls-for-equal-voting-rights
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/johnson-calls-for-equal-voting-rights
A strong part of the reason that Johnson felt compelled to
address the issue was the fact that the events in Selma were captured on film
by news agencies, causing outrage throughout the country. The movie “Selma” (which
not enough people have seen) graphically illustrates the racial injustice that
still persisted in his country 97 years after the passage of the 14th
Amendment. If you have not seen the movie, you can see it in its entirety by
clicking on the link below:
As a result of legislation written by the American Legislative
Exchange Council, states started to pass more restrictive voting laws in 2010,
and the Supreme Court ruling of June 25, 2013 further weakened the Voting
Rights Act. As a result, the 2016 Presidential election was the first one that
was held after the Supreme Court ruling – with disastrous results. 98 of the
100 largest newspapers printed editorials in the fall that Donald Trump was not
fit to be President. In the end, Hillary Clinton received endorsements from 57
newspapers, and Trump only received endorsements from 2. Thirty five of the 98
newspapers either did not endorse any one at all, or they endorsed either Gary
Johnson or Jill Stein.
Although Trump was helped to his “victory” due to the
assistance of FBI director James Comey and the Russian government (which has
been acknowledged by 17 separate intelligence agencies) the most significant
factor that allowed Trump to win a narrow victory in the electoral college, in
spite of the fact that he lost the popular vote by 3,000,000 votes, was voter
suppression. Trump’s margin of victory in Michigan was a tiny 10,704 votes. In
Wisconsin, it was 22,177, and in Pennsylvania, it was 67,416 votes. Although it
is impossible to know exactly how many people were prevented from voting, but
the article below will provide some clues:
Fortunately, the laws currently on the books have prevented
further erosion of voting rights, at least for now. Federal courts declared
against the redistricting on November 39, 2016, and Federal courts also ruled
against redistricting in Texas earlier this week. Now that Jeff Sessions is the
Attorney General (despite the fact that he committed perjury during his
testimony to Congress) it is not clear that the protection will continue to
exist.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/jeff-sessions-voting-rights-act_us_587520a2e4b099cdb0ffc2c1
When he testified on January 10, he stated that he felt that the Voting Rights Act was intrusive, and he had no problem with voter ID laws.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/jeff-sessions-voting-rights-act_us_587520a2e4b099cdb0ffc2c1
When he testified on January 10, he stated that he felt that the Voting Rights Act was intrusive, and he had no problem with voter ID laws.
Like virtually all of Trump’s cabinet picks, he is completely
unqualified for the position that he was nominated for, a point that Elizabeth
Warren brought home when she attempted to read Coretta Scott King’s 1986
letter.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-fires-preet-bharara-stop-us-attorney-investigating-presidents-finances-democrats-a7627006.html
There is strong suspicion that Preet Bharara was fired to prevent him from investigating Trump’s finances, which would constitute obstruction of justice, and would certainly be an impeachable offense. Coupled with Trump’s declining mental state, as well as growing evidence of interference by the Russia government, it is quite likely that Trump will be impeached before he is in office for a year.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-fires-preet-bharara-stop-us-attorney-investigating-presidents-finances-democrats-a7627006.html
There is strong suspicion that Preet Bharara was fired to prevent him from investigating Trump’s finances, which would constitute obstruction of justice, and would certainly be an impeachable offense. Coupled with Trump’s declining mental state, as well as growing evidence of interference by the Russia government, it is quite likely that Trump will be impeached before he is in office for a year.
However, that is not what would be best for the country.
What we actually need is a thorough and independent
investigation into the collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian
officials. If it is as comprehensive as all of the intelligence agencies
suspect, than the only possible remedy is to void the results of the election,
and appoint Hillary Clinton as the next President of the United States. Since
Donald Trump was sworn in on January 20, she would technically be the 46th
President of the United States. As a result, our country would be significantly
safer, and we could all sleep better at night.
No comments:
Post a Comment