Wednesday, June 10, 2020

the way things out to be, part 2




A little more than 10 years ago, I wrote an article about Rush Limbaugh. You can read the article at the link below:


This week, I came across some additional information that provided more background on exactly how Limbaugh got to where he is today. First, here’s the update:

He is best known as the host of his radio show The Rush Limbaugh Show, which has been in national syndication on AM and FM radio stations since 1988.
Limbaugh hosted a national television show from 1992 to 1996. He has written seven books; his first two, The Way Things Ought to Be (1992) and See, I Told You So (1993), made The New York Times Best Seller list. Limbaugh is among the highest-paid radio figures. In 2018, Forbes listed his earnings at $84.5 million. In December 2019, Talkers Magazine estimated that Limbaugh's show attracted a cumulative weekly audience of 15.5 million listeners to become the most-listened-to radio show in the United States.
Limbaugh has been one of the premiere voices of the conservative movement in the United States since the 1990s. He has been inducted into the National Radio Hall of Fame and the National Association of Broadcasters Hall of Fame During the 2020 State of the Union Address, President Donald Trump awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Limbaugh has expressed controversial viewpoints on race LGBT mattersfeminism, and sexual consent. Limbaugh rejects climate change and has supported U.S. military interventions in the Middle East. He was also one of the earlier voices pushing the idea that the coronavirus was a hoax.

He’s a “family values” kind of guy, which may help explain why he has been married 4 times. Despite his anti-gay positions, he paid Elton John $1 million to perform at his 4th wedding in 2010, a sum he could easily afford since he is worth $500 million, a nice chunk of change for a college dropout.

Rush owes a lot of his financial success to Ronald Reagan, who repealed the Fairness Doctrine in 1987.
 For more than a century, American media has tried to report facts impartially. At the beginning of the twentieth century, the Federal Communications Commission enshrined this principle in the Fairness Doctrine, which established that public media must base its news in facts and must present both sides of an argument fairly, honestly, and equitably. Beginning in the 1950s, Republicans who were ideologically opposed to the New Deal state complained that this principle, embraced by the “liberal media,” discriminated against them. In 1987, after President Ronald Reagan had placed new members on the board of the FCC, it abandoned the Fairness Doctrine, and it was formally eliminated in 2011.
With that abandonment, talk radio took off, presenting an ideological narrative that showed white taxpayers under siege by godless women and people of color. The Fox News Channel was not far behind, calling itself “fair and balanced” until 2017, when it dropped the slogan, because it presented the ideological narrative that mainstream media (MSM) rejected. Other media outlets tried to defend themselves against charges that they were biased against that narrative, so they opened up their pages and television shows to that ideological story. Increasingly, the extreme Republican narrative spread into the mainstream on the grounds that the media must show “both sides.”

(Rush Limbaugh is not the only conservative broadcaster to benefit from the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine. FOX is the most viewed cable channel, and Sean Hannity’s program was the top-rated show for 3 year in a row. Like Limbaugh, Hannity did not graduate from college.


Hannity is paid $40 million a year, and has a net worth of $250 million.)
By 2014, though, cell phones and Twitter offered images and reports from the ground in places like Ferguson, Missouri, that showed up the police version of events, echoed by Fox News Channel personalities and talk radio hosts, as dishonest… and dangerous. Young Black journalists called out the reigning narrative that people of color were “thugs” and “criminals,” but their protests did not change the basic media pattern of “both sides-ism – until last week.

(If you want to read why Minneapolis was the breaking point. the Atlantic article below provides lots of answers):

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/06/wesley-lowery-george-floyd-minneapolis-black-lives/612391/?utm_medium=10today.media.20200610.436.2&utm_source=email&utm_content=article&utm_campaign=10-for-today---4.0-styling

The murder of Gorge Floyd in Minneapolis, quickly followed by the video of two policemen in Buffalo pushing a 75 year-old man to the ground, has changed the narrative overnight. Large crowds of people in the USA and around the world turned out to protest police brutality, and the mayor of Washington D.C. had BLACK LIVES MATTER painted on the streets just north of the White House in bright yellow paint,

See the source image

Roger Goodell, the commissioner of the NFL, recently apologized to Colin Kaepernick (without naming his name), and NASCAR president Steve Phelps issued a statement about inequality before the start of the most recent race in Atlanta.

Employees of respectable news outlets (newspapers, radio, and television) are held to a high standard, and not doing do can result in termination. Even august publications like “the grey lady” (the New York Times) can occasionally make errors, and it happened last week when the Times published an op-ed by Tom Cotton, without doing the appropriate fact checking, which led to the resignation of editorial page editor James Bennett.

Bennet ran an op-ed last Wednesday by Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton titled (by the Times, not by Cotton) “Send in the Troops.” The inflammatory piece blamed “cadres of left-wing radicals like antifa” for an “orgy of violence” during the recent protests and claimed that “outnumbered police officers… bore the brunt of the violence.” Neither of these statements is true, and they clothe a false Republican narrative in what appears to be fact. Cotton’s solution to the protests was to send in the military to restore “law and order,” and he misquoted the Constitution to defend that conclusion.

Another shift towards sanity occurred on May 29, when Twitter put a warning on a tweet from Trump saying it violates the platform's rules against glorifying violence.
Early Friday morning, Trump tweeted about the protests in Minneapolis over the police killing of George Floyd, saying, “These THUGS are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd, and I won’t let that happen” while saying that he could order military action if the protests continue.
The president ended the tweet with, “Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!”

The move by Twitter to label the tweet comes amid an ongoing feud with Trump after the social media company placed its first fact checks on some of his posts this week regarding mail-in voting. 
The president just hours earlier signed an executive order aimed at increasing the ability of the government to regulate social media platforms, a marked escalation of his lengthy feud with Silicon Valley over allegations of anti-conservative bias.
Although Facebook still has not taken similar action, it likely will be forced to do so in the near future – and that’s the way things out to be.






No comments:

Post a Comment