Monday, September 21, 2026

immigration and the Bible

 


 

The U.S. diplomat arrived in West Africa in mid-June with little fanfare, hopscotching along the Atlantic coastline for scheduled visits with senior government officials in the Ivory Coast, Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Togo and Gabon, whose president greeted him inside an opulent seaside palace.

The American, a career State Department official named Christian Ehrhardt, was an unlikely diplomatic VIP. For nearly two decades, he served as an officer in the agency’s security branch, focusing on embassy protection, before being summoned to Washington last year to lead a new initiative — the Office of Remigration.

Since then, Ehrhardt, 41, has crisscrossed Africa, trying to persuade the continent’s leaders to accept flights full of people deported from the United States even though the migrants are not their own citizens. These “third country” deportation deals, a controversial innovation of the second Trump administration, have become a central part of the president’s hard-line approach to immigration, and they’re negotiated by the office Ehrhardt now oversees.

He has been making rapid progress. The Trump administration has authorized or pledged at least $410 million to facilitate agreements with 31 countries, mostly in Africa and Latin America, as of the end of June, according to internal government records reviewed by The Washington Post. The documents, which have not been previously reported, provide the most comprehensive picture to date of the Trump administration’s fast-growing third-country network.

Under the arrangements, the U.S. has expelled migrants to countries across the globe where they have no previous connection. Early deals included flights to Costa Rica carrying migrants from China, Russia, Iran and Afghanistan and a flight to the tiny African kingdom of Eswatini with migrants from Vietnam, Laos, Cuba and Jamaica.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2026/09/21/how-trump-turned-refugee-bureau-into-410-million-deportation-operation/

 

In recent weeks, the Trump administration and the Supreme Court ended Temporary Protected Status for roughly 350,000 Haitians nationals. Due to severe gang violence and ongoing security risks, the FAA bans U.S. aircraft from landing in Port-au-Prince, forcing returnees to navigate gang-controlled routes to reach other parts of the country.

The U.S. Department of State has issued a level 4 – Do Not Travel advisory for Haiti due to extreme safety risks.

The agreements have been secured under the orders of Stephen Miller, a long-standing aide to the president who now serves as White House deputy chief of staff. Current and former officials say that Miller, known for his relentless anti-immigration focus, has been able to push key appointments at the State Department that have allowed him to overrule other foreign policy objectives in his goal of achieving more deportations.

Ehrhardt is “considered a White House envoy” when he meets with foreign leaders, said a U.S. official familiar with his meetings. “The messaging is not just that he is a deputy assistant secretary of state. He’s really part of the White House, so they roll out the red carpet.” This official, like many others in this article, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal State Department operations.

The Office of Remigration — a division of about 15 employees in the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM) — marks an extraordinary break in U.S. foreign policy, inverting the nation’s long-standing commitment to resettling refugees in need into an intensive focus on expelling them from the country. The office’s name itself is a point of contention, as the term “remigration” has been popularized by white nationalists in Europe who seek the expulsion of racial minorities and immigrants.

The administration also has pledged grants totaling $179 million to the International Organization for Migration and $124 million to the U.N. Refugee Agency for refugee- and infrastructure-related projects in the third countries. Those organizations are not directly party to the deals, but that money has been negotiated by the foreign governments in connection to their deportation agreements, according to the government documents and people familiar with the deals. These payments have largely replaced voluntary contributions the U.S. government traditionally made to the global aid organizations and are used as “sweeteners” to get foreign countries to accept the third-country deportees, people familiar with the deals said.

So, what does the Bible say about immigrants?

https://sojo.net/22-bible-verses-welcoming-immigrants

Welcoming others, regardless of their background or nationality, is a central theme in scripture. This collection of verses urges us to embrace those who are different and extend kindness to the marginalized. Whether through love, acceptance, or advocacy, these verses show us the importance of caring for the immigrants in our communities.

There are 22 Bible verses on welcoming immigrants.

Here are some of them:

‘I am a stranger and an alien residing among you; give me property among you for a burying place, so that I may bury my dead out of my sight.’
Genesis 23:4

“You shall not oppress a sojourner. You know the heart of a sojourner, for you were sojourners in the land of Egypt."
Exodus 23:9 (ESV)

You shall also love the stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.
Deuteronomy 10:19

“When a stranger sojourns with you in your land, you shall not do him wrong. 34 You shall treat the stranger who sojourns with you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God."
Leviticus 19:33-34 (ESV)

‘Cursed is anyone who withholds justice from the foreigner, the fatherless or the widow.’ Then all the people shall say, ‘Amen!’
Deuteronomy 27:19 (NIV)

 

 Stephen Miller is an evil man, and the country will be better off as soon as he is gone from government service.

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Miller

 Stephen N. Miller (born August 23, 1985) is an American political advisor serving as White House deputy chief of staff for policy and homeland security advisor since 2025. He previously served as senior advisor to the president and director of speechwriting from 2017 to 2021 during the first Trump administration.

Considered one of the most influential figures of the Trump administrations and Trumpism movement, his politics have been described as far-right, anti-immigration, and white nationalist.

Miller grew up in Santa Monica, California, and attended Duke University, where he was a columnist for The Chronicle and president of the Duke chapter of Students for Academic Freedom. After graduating in 2007, he worked as press secretary for US representatives Michele Bachmann and John Shadegg. In 2009, he joined the staff of Alabama senator Jeff Sessions, where he worked on immigration policy and helped defeat the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013. As an aide to Sessions, Miller influenced the direction of Breitbart News. He advised both of Trump's presidential campaigns. After Trump's loss in the 2020 election, Miller founded America First Legal, a conservative legal advocacy organization, in 2021.

Miller has been a central figure in the Trump administration's immigration policy, including the family separation policy and Executive Order 13769, which restricted travel from several Muslim-majority countries. As director of speechwriting, he supervised the writing of Trump's inaugural and State of the Union addresses. Miller is on the Southern Poverty Law Center's list of extremists. His influence and views are the subject of both traditional and independent media, as well as of both domestic and international.

Stephen N. Miller was born on August 23, 1985, in the affluent North of Montana neighborhood in Santa Monica, California, the second of three children[of Miriam (née Glosser) and Michael Miller. Miller is of Ashkenazi Jewish descent

His family's lineage escaped Russian pogroms and the Holocaust.

 

In view of the horrors his ancestors endured, Stephen Miller’s hard-line approach on immigration makes absolutely no sense at all.

This is what the plaque on the Statute of Liberty says:

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.

"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!









          








 

 

 

 

 


Tuesday, September 15, 2026

in a galaxy far, far away.....

 


In 1967, the United States and 117 other counties signed the Outer Space Treaty.




Star Wars Main Theme (Full)

The Outer Space Treaty, formally called the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, is a multilateral treaty that forms the basis of international space law.

Negotiated and drafted under the auspices of the United Nations, it was opened for signature in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union on 27 January 1967, entering into force on 10 October 1967. As of October 2025, 118 countries are parties to the treaty—including all major spacefaring nations—and another 20 are signatories.

Key provisions of the treaty include prohibiting nuclear weapons in space; limiting the use of the Moon and all other celestial bodies to peaceful purposes; establishing that space shall be freely explored and used by all nations; and precluding any country from claiming sovereignty over outer space or any celestial body. Although it forbids establishing military bases, testing weapons and conducting military maneuvers on celestial bodies, the treaty does not expressly ban all military activities in space, nor the establishment of military space forces or the placement of conventional weapons in space.

The OST also declares that space is an area for free use and exploration by all and "shall be the province of all mankind". Drawing heavily from the Antarctic Treaty of 1961, the Outer Space Treaty likewise focuses on regulating certain activities and preventing unrestricted competition that were thought might lead to conflict at that time.[9] Consequently, it is largely silent or ambiguous on newly developed space activities such as lunar and asteroid mining.

OST was at the heart of a 'network' of inter-state treaties and strategic power negotiations to achieve the best available conditions for nuclear weapons world security.

OST was the most important link in the chain of international legal arrangements for space from the late 1950s to the mid-1980s. The OST was followed by four additional agreements, with varied levels of accession: the safe return of astronauts who land in a foreign country (1967); liability for damages caused by spacecraft (1972); the registration of space vehicles (1976); and rules for activities on the Moon (1979). As the first and most foundational legal instrument of space law,[14] the Outer Space Treaty and its broader principles of promoting the civil and peaceful use of space continue to underpin multilateral initiatives in space, such as the International Space Station and the Artemis Program.

History

 The Outer Space Treaty was spurred by the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) in the 1950s, which could reach targets through outer space. The Soviet Union's launch of Sputnik, the first artificial satellite, in October 1957, followed by a subsequent arms race with the United States, hastened proposals to prohibit the use of outer space for military purposes. On 17 October 1963, the U.N. General Assembly unanimously adopted a resolution prohibiting the introduction of weapons of mass destruction in outer space. Various proposals for an arms control treaty governing outer space were debated during a General Assembly session in December 1966, culminating in the drafting and adoption of the Outer Space Treaty the following January.

Houston, we have a problem.

News broke this morning that the United States has stationed weapons in Earth’s orbit.

The United States has stationed weapons in Earth’s orbit, Air Force Secretary Troy E. Meink said on Monday, the first such public acknowledgment by a Pentagon official after years of preparations to counter potential deployments by Russia and China.

“We are increasing readiness against existing threats, and the United States has on-orbit space control weapons capable of defending the Joint Force against hostile adversary action,” he said at a convention in Maryland, according to a news release published on the Air Force’s website.

Mr. Meink did not provide details about the type of weapons or say when they had been deployed. He made his remarks in a keynote speech at the Air, Space and Cyber Conference in National Harbor, Md., an annual forum hosted by the Air and Space Forces Association, a nonprofit organization for members of both services.

The Space Force did not immediately respond to a request for comment late Monday.




 If you are paying attention, you may notice that the space force patch looks a lot like the patch for the Enterprise spaceship.

 


The Pentagon has long feared that China and Russia are making advances in space operations that could threaten U.S. ground forces as well as American satellites.

 https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/15/us/politics/space-weapon-air-force-secretary.html

Neither Pete Hegseth or Donald Trump can be trusted to make responsible actions related to weapons in space, so it is up to congress to protect us, which is all the more reason that the midterm elections are so important.

 The United StatesRussia and China began testing weapons capable of destroying satellites decades ago, but the United States has since disavowed such arms because they leave destructive debris fields in orbit.

In recent years, the Air Force started developing “low-debris-causing weapons” capable of disrupting or disabling enemy satellites, Frank Kendall, who served as Air Force secretary under President Joe Biden, told The Times in a 2024 interview.

Gen. Chance Saltzman, who served as the Space Force’s chief of space operations during the Biden and second Trump administrations until his retirement last month, told a Senate committee in 2023 that the new space weapons systems would be fully operational by 2026.

Neither Mr. Kendall nor Gen. Saltzman specified how the systems would work. Other former Pentagon officials have said they likely would include lasers, high-powered microwave systems or even U.S. satellites that can grab or move enemy satellites.

Mr. Kendall said in 2024 that it was prudent to recognize that space “is a place that can be used for military advantage.”

 With luck, we’ll avoid warfare in space, but it will take vigilance by congress to keep us safe – so be sure to vote in November.

 

 


Friday, September 11, 2026

Chicago ain't ready for reform

 


Chicago ranks as the most corrupt city in the United States, according to long-term reports by the analyzing Department of Justice data.

 

 Key Findings on Chicago Corruption

 

  • Federal Convictions: The Northern District of Illinois (which covers the Chicago metro area) recorded nearly 1,800 public corruption convictions between 1976 and 2019.
  • Top Rankings: Chicago consistently leads the nation in total federal corruption convictions, staying ahead of major metropolitan areas like Los Angeles (second) and New York City (third).
  • Contributing Factors: Studies attribute the city's high rates to historical machine politics, localized aldermanic privilege, and misuse of public funds

 

In the early 1900’s, corruption was rampant in Chicago, and the Everleigh club played a prominent role

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everleigh_Club

Reform of the political system was attempted during its early years, but a noted Chicago politician famously said “Chicago ain’t ready for reform.

During the reign of Al Capone, the corruption in Chicago spread west to Cicero.

https://www.bettergov.org/2013/10/27/cicero-capones-long-gone-but-not-corruption/

One of the entertaining subplots on “Boardwalk Empire” this season is the fact-based depiction of infamous mob boss Al Capone’s reign of terror in west suburban Cicero, where “Scarface” set up temporary headquarters in the mid-20s to escape the heat of Chicago’s one-term reform mayor.

Bottom of Form

The highly acclaimed HBO series reminds us that Al and his brother Frank hijacked Cicero’s 1924 municipal election with enough threats, intimidation and actual violence to make sure their candidate won, which guaranteed them a safe haven as they expanded their organized crimes.

Bottom of Form

Capone went to prison for tax evasion in 1931, but the mob continued to exert influence on Cicero and its wanton politics for decades after that.

One recent town president, Betty Loren-Maltese, widow of mid-level mobster and municipal official Frank Maltese, went to jail for her role in a mobbed-up multi-million-dollar insurance scam.

Her successor, Ramiro Gonzalez, promised reform and then put a dozen relatives on the payroll.

And his successor, current President Larry Dominick, made the same pledge and then one-upped Gonzalez by hiring 20 relatives, angering the town’s large Latino population with ethnic slurs, paying out several hundred thousand tax dollars to settle sexual-harassment lawsuits, and hiring a corrupt ex-Chicago alderman to manage the town’s special events.

The hiring of Ambrosio Medrano, who may be Chicago’s most corrupt alderman, with three felony convictions in three separate scams, made me wonder why the residents of Cicero put up with this nonsense — why, for instance, Dominick’s been elected three times by comfortable margins.

I asked Betty Loren-Maltese, who’s out of prison and still maintaining her innocence as she watches Cicero, talks to old political friends and blogs on the goings-on.

Here’s her explanation, via email:

“I believe the system of expanded services, perks and employment rewards isn’t a government function but a government-funded voter bribery system designed to keep 10 percent of the population under control.

“Cicero has about 90,000 residents, but with low voter turnout it only takes about 6,000 votes to win, which is generally 3,000 families.

“Between the town, high school, college, park district and grammar school there are approximately 2,000 jobs and tens of millions in government contracts.

The bribery that was found in Cicero has now spread to national elections.



Trump, hoping to salvage midterms, makes a dubious pledge to give every US adult $5,000 if GOP wins

 President Donald Trump may have opened himself up to a “legitimate” legal issue Wednesday night after promising Americans $5,000 dividend checks, a number of experts warned.

Speaking at the RNC midterm convention in Dallas, Texas, Trump pledged to award Americans with $5,000 if Republicans end up performing well in the midterms and maintain their congressional majority. And, while he’s promised Americans cash in the past — none of which ever materialized — Trump’s explicit promise to award Americans for electing Republicans, some critics said, may run afoul of federal law.

The primary legal threat is 18 U.S.C. § 600, which criminalizes promising government benefits made possible by Congress as a reward for supporting a political party,” wrote Thomas Logan, a U.S.-Asia relations specialist and strategist, in a social media post on X.

“Tying the money to GOP control fits § 600 far more closely than a standard tax-cut pledge. Vote-buying statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 597 and 52 U.S.C. § 10307(c) also apply. While defenders would argue this is a policy platform rather than a bribe, the explicit transaction creates real legal risk.”

Political writer Mona Burns called Trump’s promise an outright “bribe,” noting that violation of 18 U.S. Code § 597 is “punishable by fine or imprisonment of not more than one year,” and political scientist Danny Krikorian argued that the president’s pledge opened a “legitimate” legal question.

President Donald Trump pledged Wednesday to send every American adult $5,000 if Republicans retain control of the House and Senate in the midterm elections, an extraordinary gambit to reverse his party's sagging fortunes in November.

The dubious promise would most likely cost more than $1 trillion and require congressional approval, and would further exacerbate the country’s nearly $1.8 trillion annual budget deficit and concerns about inflation.

“Trump explicitly tied a massive cash benefit to Republican electoral victory. That creates a legitimate §600 question,” Krikorian wrote Thursday in a social media post on X.

“Trump’s wording pushes unusually close to the conceptual boundary of vote buying. Current Supreme Court precedent makes a criminal vote-buying case difficult but not impossible. The legal line becomes much clearer if payment is conditioned on voting Republican, voting at all, proving how someone voted, or otherwise providing partisan support.”

 https://www.bettergov.org/2013/10/27/cicero-capones-long-gone-but-not-corruption/

The $5000 payment is not the first time that Trump has promised to send money to voters. None of those promises, naturally, have not been kept – and nether will this one.

Unlike Chicago, the United States IS ready for reform, but it won’t happen until after the midterms.

As it stands now, though, Trump is the MOST corrupt president our country has ever had.

 https://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/most-corrupt-presidents.htm


Some ethics watchdogs describe the Trump presidency as one of the most corrupt presidencies in American history. Analysts frequently point to thousands of documented conflicts of interest connected to Trump businesses while he held the White House.

During his time in office, Donald Trump continued to benefit financially from outside income tied to the Trump Organization. Estimates suggest more than $1.6 billion in revenue flowed through those business interests during the years of the administration.

Critics argued these relationships raised potential concerns about the Constitution's emoluments clause and whether foreign governments or special interests could influence policy. The administration was also marked by nepotism and unusually close ties between public office and private business.

As of 2026, Trump is the only U.S. president ever criminally indicted, facing dozens of felony charges tied to activities during and between his presidential terms. Many scholars place the Trump administration alongside other historically notorious cases of presidential corruption.

Although it is unlikely that the Republicans will win in the midterms, none of us are going to get $5000 checks – and that is a  good thing.