Thursday, August 27, 2026

something to chew on




 

It’s no secret that food prices have gone up in the last year, and it also is no secret   WHY they went up.

Here is a quick summary:

Overall food prices in the United States are up about 3.8% in mid-2026 compared to last year, driven by rising transportation costs, weather impacts, and tight beef supplies. 

 

Price Trends

  • Groceries (Food-at-Home): Up roughly 2.9% to 3.0% over the past year.
  • Restaurants (Food-Away-from-Home): Up about 3.4% to 3.6% compared to last year, continuing to outpace grocery inflation.
  • Overall Forecast: Overall, full-year food price inflation will be around 3% to 3.4%. 

 

Hardest-Hit Items

 

  • Beef and Veal: Prices remain high due to historic lows in U.S. cattle herds combined with strong demand.
  • Sugar and Sweets: Projected to see some of the highest increases at over 6%.
  • Beverages: Non-alcoholic drinks and coffee face steeper price tags due to global weather challenges and supply pressures.
  • Produce: Specific fruits and vegetables are seeing localized jumps tied to weather extremes and transit costs. 
  •  
  • One source projects full-year food price inflation to land around 3% to 3.4%.  

Driving Factors

 

Fuel and Energy: Spikes in regional fuel costs have made shipping and logistics more expensive.

 Weather & Climate: Droughts, shifting weather patterns, and crop issues globally affect harvests.

  • Labor Costs: Higher wages and ongoing labor shortages in farming and processing add to retail costs.  

The national average for regular gasoline sits at $4.09 per gallon, up significantly from the start of the year due to geopolitical tensions and disruptions. 

Key Price Changes in 2026

 

  • Spring Peak: Prices surged in the spring, peaking at $4.56 per gallon on May 21 following conflicts in the Middle East and tightening crude oil supplies.
  • Summer Trend: After a brief dip in early summer, prices rebounded and stayed above $4.00 per gallon through August for the first time on record. 
  • Overall Increase: Prices remain up roughly 35% to 45% compared to the start of the year, driven by crude oil holding in the $80 to $90 per barrel range. 


Labor shortages were caused by stricter enforcement of laws by the Department of Homeland Security.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) through Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is currently averaging about 2,000 arrests per day.  

Current Arrest Numbers

  • Daily Average: Federal immigration officials recently doubled their pace to hit a target of roughly 2,000 arrests per day.
  • Recent Totals: Reports show that ICE detained more than 10,000 people over a single five-day period.
  • July Trends: Before this latest surge, ICE averaged over 1,580 daily arrests in July, which included a high rate of individuals without criminal records. 

  • Recent Operations:
  • Operation Safe Community: A recent two-week sweep in Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., led by the Department of Homeland Security resulted in 1,328 arrests.  
  • Criminal vs. Non-Criminal: DHS reported that nearly 400 of the individuals arrested in the D.C. regional sweep had prior criminal charges or convictions. However, national data indicates that a large portion of overall detainees across the country do not have a criminal record.

Enforcement Goals

 

 White House Targets: The administration established a daily arrest target floor of 1,800 to 2,000 enforcement actions.

  Independent Operations: ICE is largely conducting these operations independently with increased street personnel rather than relying heavily on joint task

 Like our parents, both my sister and I do not dine out a lot, preferring home cooked meals because they are healthier and cheaper. Like our kids, Sharon and I use coupons whenever we can, and we are not averse to buying at least some of our groceries at Walmart.

Over the course of the first 7 months of the year, we averaged slightly more than $600 a month on groceries, which seems like a lot just for 2 people.

Our household income, even with a retired wife, is high enough that we can afford to pay that amount of money for food – but there are a LOT of people who can’t, so they need to rely on public assistance for their food.

 https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/a-closer-look-at-who-benefits-from-snap-state-by-state-fact-sheets#Arizona

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps) is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, reaching some 41 million people nationwide in 2024. These fact sheets provide state-by-state data on who participates in the SNAP program, the benefits they receive, and SNAP’s role in strengthening the economy.

The link shown above shows how the benefits vary by state.

Here are the facts for Arizona:

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps) is the nation’s most important anti-hunger program, reaching some 41 million people nationwide in 2024. These fact sheets provide state-by-state data on who participates in the SNAP program, the benefits they receive, and SNAP’s role in strengthening the economy.

Whom Does SNAP Reach?

In federal fiscal year 2024, it helped:

  • 923,400 Arizona residents, or 12% of the state population (1 in 8)
  • 41,697,500 participants in the United States, or 12% of the total population (1 in 8)
  •  

Arizona

 

more than 68% of SNAP participants are in families with children

 

almost 29% are in families with members who are older adults or are disabled

 

more than 40% are in working families

Nationally

 

more than 62% of SNAP participants are in families with children

 

more than 37% are in families with members who are older adults or are disabled

 

more than 38% are in working families

 

Source: CBPP analysis of data from USDA Food and Nutrition Service

Most SNAP Participants in Arizona Have Incomes Below the Poverty Line

Share of participants by household income, fiscal year 2022

 Source: CBPP analysis of data from USDA Food and Nutrition Service.

Many Arizona households struggle to put food on the table. The most recent data show in 2023:

  • 11.8% of households were “food insecure,” meaning that their access to adequate food is limited by a lack of money and other resources

 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that in a weak economy, $1 in SNAP benefits generates $1.50 in economic activity. Households receive SNAP benefits on electronic benefit transfer cards, which can be used only to purchase food at one of about 261,400 authorized retail locations around the country, including some 4,600 in Arizona.

Notes: In addition to SNAP, in FY 2024 an average of about 5,000 individuals in Arizona received benefits through the Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR), which is a federal program that provides commodity foods to low-income households, including the elderly, living on Indian reservations, and to Native American families residing in designated areas near reservations and in the State of Oklahoma.

If my wife and I were eligible for SNAP benefits, we would receive a monthly benefit of $376, roughly half what we currently spend. The benefits for each of us would be slightly less than $6 day, which would be enough to buy a Big Mac, if your skipped the fries and a drink.

Unlike tax cuts. SNAP benefits provide the biggest “bang for the bucket”, which I detailed in the article below:

https://tohell-andback.blogspot.com/2013/05/food-for-thought.html


 


Although today’s Republic party has not been generous with benefits, the program actually started during the Nixon administration.

The Nixon administration also passed the Clean Air Act of 1970, the Clean Water Act of 1970, established the Environmental Protection Agency, and passed OSHA. From 1970 to 1975, spending on human resource programs exceeded spending for defense for the first time since the Second World War.

Sadly, the people who rely on SNAP benefits are going to see their lived get much harder, largely due to the actions of the people in Congress.

 

In July of 2025, congress passed The One Big Beautiful Bill act, which is definitely a misnomer, since there is anything beautiful about it.

Like all laws the are good parts, bad parts, and ugly parts, and the link listed blow goes into detail on all of those:

https://taxfoundation.org/blog/one-big-beautiful-bill-pros-cons/

 

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) cuts federal funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by $186 billion to $187 billion over 10 years. This represents an approximate 20% decrease in total funding, making it the largest reduction in the history of the program. [1, 2]

Data from organizations like the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) shows that between the bill's passage in July 2025 and mid-2026, SNAP participation fell nationwide by about 12%, resulting in around 5 million people losing their benefits 

The primary policy mechanisms causing these reductions include:

 

  • Expanded Work Requirements: The age limit for able-bodied adults without dependents required to work at least 80 hours per month to keep benefits was raised from 54 to 64 years old. Stricter 20-hour-per-week work rules were also introduced for parents whose youngest dependent child is 14 or older
  • Reduced Benefit Sizes: Individual benefit adequacy is reduced by restrictions placed on future cost adjustments to the Thrifty Food Plan (the model used to calculate SNAP allotments). The average recipient is projected to lose about $286 per year by 2034 relative to rising food costs. 
  • Cost Shifting to States: The law requires states to assume a higher share of administrative costs (increasing from 50% to 75%) and forces states to pay up to 15% of direct benefit costs based on their administrative "payment error rates," leading many states to tighten local eligibility rules. 
  • Exemption Eliminations: Automatic work-requirement exemptions were removed for veterans, unhoused individuals, and youth aging out of foster care. 

 

Congress passed the largely along party lines in early July 2025.  

Senate Vote

  • Date: July 1, 2025
  • Vote: 51–50
  • Details: Vice President J.D. Vance cast the tie-breaking vote. Three Republicans voted against the bill alongside the unified Democratic caucus

House Vote

  • Date: July 3, 2025
  • Vote: 218–214
  • Details: The House recorded the final passage. Two Republicans (Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania) voted with all voting Democrats against the measure. 

 

President Donald Trump signed the reconciliation package into law on July 4, 2025. 

 

Due to the fact that many of the provisions in the bill are unpopular, some of the changes to not become effective until January of 2027, which conveniently is AFTER the 2026 midterms.

 If the “adults in the room” regains control of congress in November, a good first step would be to repeal the One big Beautiful Bill, in large part because it will greatly increase the national debt.

The national debt of the United States is the total amount of money borrowed by the federal government over time to cover budget shortfalls, which recently surpassed $40 trillion

Key Facts

  • Total Amount: Gross U.S. debt officially topped $40 trillion in August 2026 according to reports. 
  • Per Person Share: This total equals roughly $116,800 for every individual living in the U.S.
  • Causes: The government spends more money on public programs and services than it collects in taxes, creating a yearly deficit. Borrowing to pay for these shortfalls drives up the total debt. 
  • Types of Debt: It includes debt held by the public (investors, foreign governments, the Federal Reserve) and intragovernmental debt (money owed to federal accounts like trust funds). 
  • Interest Costs: Servicing the interest on this accumulated debt now costs over a trillion dollars annually 

The other reason why it is necessary to repeal the OBBB is “the elephant in the room”, which is the war in Iran.

 


https://www.americanprogress.org/article/fact-sheet-costs-of-the-trump-administrations-war-in-iran/

 Defense costs

·         According to the Department of Defense (DOD), 14 American service members have been killed and at least another 414 were wounded in the war as of July 14.

·         The DOD has neither provided adequate estimates of the costs of operations to date nor has provided enough clarity and detail around the nature of operations to allow for precise independent accounting. Nevertheless, reliable, independent estimates from the Center for Strategic and International Studies place the total costs at between $34 billion and $42 billion as of June 23, accounting for the costs of personnel deployments, munitions, equipment loss and damage, fuel, security, and other costs. Other estimates, which assume a broader range of costs and higher burn rate for munitions, suggest the cost of Operation Epic Fury could have reached more than $100 billion by late June.

·         None of this necessitates immediate supplemental funding. The best course of action for Congress is to provide additional general transfer authority for the current fiscal year and to ensure the DOD budget for the coming year reflects actual needs.

o    The DOD has already requested $114 billion in its FY 2027 appropriations request to replenish critical, high-demand munitions stockpiles—nearly five times the enacted funds for these munitions for FY 2026—as well as an additional $60 billion for other munitions development and procurement.

o    Congress should work with the DOD to ensure that the FY 2027 budget includes appropriate funding for the necessary magazine depth rather than seek to provide any additional funding through supplemental assistance.

Domestic economic costs

·         Prices for fuel remain higher than before the Trump administration’s attacks on Iran. As of July 14, Americans had paid more than $68 billion in extra costs for gas and diesel since the Iran war began, according to the Brown University Iran War Energy Cost Tracker. That amounts to more than $500 per household in higher costs.

·         Gas and diesel prices are about 30 percent higher than before the war. The national average price for regular gasoline was $3.86 per gallon as of July 14, compared with $2.98 on February 27, according to AAA.

o    As of July 14, nine states (Alaska, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Nevada, New York, Oregon, Washington) and Washington, D.C., had regular gas prices above $4 per gallon. The states with the highest percentage increases (40 percent or more) relative to prices before the war were Montana, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.

o     

Our country is facing numerous challenges right now, and there is little than any of us can do to fix those problems – exempt for one VERY important tool, and that is to VOTE

 




No comments:

Post a Comment