Saturday, December 21, 2019

Hold the phone !!







This morning’s  New York Times had two vastly different article about telephones.

The first article was a step back in time, when EVERYONE had a land line, and NOBODY had a cell phone. Here’s the opening paragraph:

“This is a lament for the landline, a rhapsody for its dial tone, a hymn to the way it connected people. It’s the little things we miss. The landline was a focal point of the home, an antidote to atomization and loneliness, those scourges of our age.


I’m old enough to remember a time when not only did everyone had a landline, most people also had a party line, which made it virtually impossible to have a private conversation with just about anybody.




Although we got our first telephone answering machine in the early 1980’s, my parents never made that transition. If they weren’t home when you called, you couldn’t leave a message for them. Not surprisingly, they never acquired cell phones, even though both of them were still alive when cell phones first came out in the early 1990’s. They also never owned a personal computer, even though early versions were available during the same time period.

Even after we moved to Flagstaff in 2011, I still had a land line because you needed one in order to have internet service, Eventually, of course, computer technology had improved to the point that a land line was no longer necessary to have internet service. Since I was spending roughly $60 a month for the land line, it was not a hard decision to drop it.

The second article about phones covered not only the present, but also the future.


A vast majority of the people in our country now own cell phones. In fact, There are approximately 330 million cell phones in the United States of America. If you are keeping track, America has a population of about 311 million people. Not far behind, unfortunately, is gun ownership. There are nearly three hundred million privately owned firearms in the United States: a hundred and six million handguns, a hundred and five million rifles, and eighty-three million shotguns.

By the way, if you think that landlines are dead, you’d likely be surprised at the fact that 46% of the households in America still have landlines.

We all love the convenience of our cell phones. Not only do they allow us to make phone calls virtually everywhere, they are also a very adequate replacement for our cameras, since picture quality today is comparable to what the best cameras offered 50 years ago. On top of that, the apps that we download provide an opportunity for literally thousands of additional benefits.

Those apps, though, also highlight the DISADVANTAGE of cell phones. As the second article points out, we can now be tracked virtually anywhere. To a very large degree, too, even basic computer knowledge can allow hackers to listen in to our phone conversations. Ironically, we are back to the time of party lines, where phone conversations were rarely private.

There is no question that my parents would have found cell phones and personal computers to be very confusing. Imagine, then, what would happen if today’s teenagers had to make a call on a land line. The link below shows what happens when that occurs.


Do you remember the days when you could go into a phone booth, drop in a dime, and make a call? Believe it or not, phone booths still exist, although the day of the 10 cent phone call has now faded into history. Today, there are still 100,000 phone booths that are in operation in America – and they are still a profitable business. Pay phone providers reported $286 million in revenue in 2015, according to the most recent FCC report. They can still be profitable, particularly in places where there isn't cell phone or landline coverage, said Tom Keane, president of Pacific Telemanagement Services. Keane's company operates 20,000 pay phones around the country.





Alexander Graham Bell would be astonished at how popular his invention is today. By  the same token, most people would be surprised to learn that Mr. Bell would not allow a phone in his study because he considered it to be an intrusion. His wife and mother never used the telephone because both of them were deaf,, which later caused him to work with deaf people.  While he was working as a private tutor, one of his pupils was Helen Keller, who came to him as a young child unable to see, hear, or speak. She was later to say that Bell dedicated his life to the penetration of that "inhuman silence which separates and estranges".[n 1893, Keller performed the sod-breaking ceremony for the construction of Bell's new Volta Bureau, dedicated to "the increase and diffusion of knowledge relating to the deaf".


Oops, I’ve got to go. I think I have a call coming in. 







Thursday, December 12, 2019

the father of the bar code





It’s hard to imagine doing grocery shopping without the help of the bar codes attached to the various items we buy. It seems like we’ve had bar codes practically forever, but there WAS a time in most of our lives that we didn’t.

The man who actually invented the modern bar code (technically the Universal Product Code, or UPC) passed away earlier this month at the age of 94.


If you really want to get technical, George Laurer didn’t originate the concept of the bar code, but simply improved on a design created by a man named Norman Woodland, who received a patent for a similar design way back in 1952 - but the TRUE origin of the bar code actually goes back to 1844!

After graduating from Atlantic City High School, Woodland did military service in World War II as a technical assistant with the Manhattan Project in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Woodland went on to earn his Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering (BSME) from Drexel University (then called Drexel Institute of Technology) in 1947. From 1948-1949, he worked as a lecturer in mechanical engineering at Drexel.
In 1948, Bernard Silver, a fellow Drexel Institute graduate student with Woodland, overheard a supermarket executive asking the dean of engineering if the Institute could determine how to capture product information automatically at checkout. The dean turned down the request, but Silver was interested enough to mention the problem to Woodland. After working on some preliminary ideas, Woodland was persuaded that they could create a viable product.
After quitting his teaching job, he moved to Florida. While at the beach one day, he again considered the problem. When he was in the Boy Scouts, he learned Morse Code. He drew dots and dashes in the sand similar to the shapes used in Morse code. (The first telegraph, which used Morse code, was sent in 1844). 
After pulling them downward with his fingers, producing thin lines resulting from the dots and thick lines from the dashes, he came up with the concept of a two-dimensional, linear Morse code. after sharing it with Silver and adapting optical sound film technology, they applied for a patent on October 20, 1949, receiving U.S. Patent 2,612,994 Classifying Apparatus and Method on October 7, 1952, covering both linear bar code and circular bulls-eye printing designs.
In 1951, Woodward and Silver were working for IBM. Since the company did not feel the patent was not commercially feasible, they sold it to Philco, who later sold it to RCA. The company spent more than a decade trying to develop commercial applications, but never succeeded. The patent expired in 1969.
In 1971, IBM became interested again, and transferred Woodward to its facilities in North Carolina to continue to work on the project. While there, he met another IBM employee named George Laurer.
Laurer realized that the Woodland’s pattern was ineffective because of smearing during printing. Instead, he designed a vertical pattern of stripes which he proposed to his superior in 1971 or 1972. This change was accepted by IBM management and Laurer then worked with Woodland and mathematician David Savir to develop and refine the details.These included the addition of a check digit to provide error correction. In 1973, the IBM proposal was accepted by the Symbol Selection committee of the Uniform Grocery Product Code Council, a consortium of grocery store companies.
The first product scanned with a bar code was a package of gum in an Ohio supermarket in Ohio. Today, UPC barcodes are being scanned more than 6 billion times each day – and all because a young guy drew some figures in the sand at a beach in Florida.

Image result for Barcode Logo



Saturday, December 7, 2019

The most powerful mob boss in the world





American has long been fascinated by movies about gangsters. To date, there have been well over 100 produced. The best of the bunch can be found at the link below:


The Godfather (1972) and The Godfather, Part II are generally considered to be the best movies about mobsters, but there are plenty of others on the list that are also worth watching.

Due to the Kefauver hearings of 1957, most people are at least dimly aware of the names of the 5 New York crime families – Gambino, Lucchese, Genovese, Bonanno, and Columbo, and they are also likely familiar with a guy named Whitey Bolger.

The heads of the various crime families were all powerful men. Although many of them have long since passed on, there IS one man alive today who is more powerful than any of them.

Without disclosing his identity (until later) I’d like to give you a timeline of events that will provide a clue as to who this guy is.

1)    On June 8, 2019, 59 year old White House insider, David Goldberg, was found dead in his New York apartment. His claim to fame was that he predicted the Iran False flag operation. Friends of Mr. Goldberg were given access to his accounts before his passing. They will be maintaining them, and posting new information as it comes in. At this time, they are reviewing many documents in Mr. Goldberg’s possession, some of which appear to be top secret government documents.


2)   On August 10, 2019, Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in his cell at the Metropolitan Correction Center in New York City.
  
On July 23, 2019, three weeks prior to his death, Epstein was found unconscious in his jail cell with injuries to his neck. Epstein believed that he was attacked by his cellmate, who was awaiting trial for four counts of murder, while the correctional staff suspected attempted suicide. After that incident, he was placed on suicide watch. Six days later, on July 29, 2019, Epstein was taken off suicide watch and placed in a special housing unit with another inmate. Epstein's close associates said he was in "good spirits".

When Epstein was placed in the special housing unit, the jail informed the Justice Department that he would have a cellmate, and that a guard would look into the cell every 30 minutes. These procedures were not followed on the night of his death.  On August 9, 2019, Epstein's cellmate was transferred out, and no new replacement cellmate was brought in. Later in the evening, in violation of the jail's normal procedure, Epstein was not checked every 30 minutes. The two guards who were assigned to check his jail unit that night fell asleep and did not check on him for about three hours; the guards falsified related records. Two cameras in front of Epstein's cell also malfunctioned that night.


3)   On November 19, 2019, Thomas Bowers, a Deutsche Bank executive who approved various loans that the bank had approved for Donald Trump, committed suicide in his home in Malibu, California.


4)   On December 4, 2019, Melania Horcharenko, who worked at the U.S embassy in Ukraine, was found dead in her home in Maryland. She left her position in the embassy a few days after Marie Yovanovich was recalled. Horcharenko was privy to virtually every incident that was mentioned during the impeachment hearings (including the July 25 phone call). Due to her intimate knowledge of many of the events in Ukraine, she is suspected to be the whistle blower who first called the transactions there to the attention of the intelligence community in our country. Horcharenko was set to be deposed behind closed doors sometime next week due to the classified nature of her work in Ukraine. 

(editors note: as compelling as this story is, keep in mind that the ONLY source for it was a website known as White House Insider. Snopes,  reliable fact checking website, found that not only did Malian Horcharenko not exist, she also was not on the list of people who were scheduled to testify).

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-impeachment-witness-die/


As proof that emotions are running high on both sides of the impeachment story is the fact that Jonathon Turley, the constitutional law expert who testified AGAINST impeaching Trump has received a barrage of threats against him. Both his home and his office have been inundated with threatening messages, and demands that he be fired from George Washington University.  

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/05/politics/jonathan-turley-impeachment-expert-congress/index.html

The common thread to all 4 people, of course, is that they have some connection to Donald Trump.

The most recent mobster movie that has been release is “The Irishman”, which features performances by Robert De Niro, Al Pacino, and Joe Pesci. The film follows Frank Sheeran (De Niro), a truck driver who becomes a hitman involved with mobster Russell Bufalino (Pesci) and his crime family, including his time working for the powerful Teamster Jimmy Hoffa (Pacino).


“The Irishman” tells the story of some real-life mobsters (one of whom apparently killed Jimmy Hoffa), but here is the unsettling part:

Donald Trump personally knew all of the mobsters portrayed in the movie, and his connection to mob figures goes back 30 years. 

Back in the 1980s and 1990s, Trump’s buildings and his casinos attracted underworld figures like “Fat Tony” Salerno, the Fedora-wearing, cigar-chomping boss of the Genovese crime family. Salerno, who’s portrayed in the film by Domenick Lombardozzi, supplied the fast-drying concrete that built Trump Tower and other Trump properties. Salerno also controlled the local concrete workers union, and when a strike shut down construction in Manhattan in 1982, the one of the few buildings that wasn’t affected was Trump Tower.

In 1983, the year Trump Tower opened its doors, the future president reportedly met the Genovese family boss. The common thread linking Salerno and Trump was Roy Cohn, the infamous lawyer who represented both men. Cohn, the heavy-lidded henchman to Senator Joseph McCarthy, introduced the two men in his Manhattan townhouse, according to the late journalist Wayne Barrett. Under oath, Trump swore that wasn’t true, but he also swore that he didn’t know that Cohn represented Salerno, a fact that had been widely reported in Cohn’s obituary a few years earlier.

And it’s not just Trump who has links to the world depicted in The Irishman. It also overlapped with some of the figures in Trump’s world, past and present. Roger Stone, Trump’s longtime political adviser, also met Salerno when he visited Cohn’s Manhattan brownstone.

Rudy Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer, also crossed paths with Salerno as New York’s top federal prosecutor in the 1980s. Giuliani was obsessed with Salerno. “Tony was the Tip O’Neill of the underworld and would reside forever in Rudy Giuliani’s mind,” wrote the legendary New York columnist Jimmy Breslin. Giuliani went after Salerno with such zeal that the mobster’s defense attorney complained that the prosecutor ″has made it his personal mission to bury my client.″

In March 1986, Giuliani announced that a grand jury had indicted Salerno and others on charges that included rigging construction bids. Trump Plaza, a co-op apartment building on Manhattan’s East Side, was specifically mentioned in the 29-count indictment.

When Giuliani says he has “insurance” on his famous client, is it to Trump’s connection to the lost word of The Irishman that he’s referring?


Omertà (/oʊˈmɛərtə/, Italian pronunciation: [omerˈta]) is a Southern Italian code of silence and code of honor that places importance on silence in the face of questioning by authorities or outsiders; non-cooperation with authorities, the government, or outsiders; and willfully ignoring and generally avoiding interference with the illegal activities of others (i.e., not contacting law enforcement or the authorities when one is aware of, witness to, or even the victim of certain crimes). It originated and remains common in Southern Italy, where banditry or brigandage and Mafia-type criminal organizations (like the CamorraCosa Nostra'Ndrangheta and Sacra Corona Unita) have long been strong. Similar codes are also deeply rooted in other areas of the Mediterranean, including rural SpainCrete (Greece), and Corsica, all of which share a common or similar historic culture with Southern Italy.
It also exists, to a lesser extent, in certain Italian-American neighborhoods, especially in neighborhoods where the Italian-American Mafia has strong influence, as well as in Italian ethnic enclaves in countries such as GermanyCanada, and Australia, where Italian organized crime exists. Similar codes of silence have been observed in Jewish-AmericanGreek-AmericanAfrican-AmericanHispanic-American, and certain working class Irish-American neighborhoods. Retaliation against informers is common in criminal circles, where informers are known as "rats" or "snitches".




Another key element of omerta is loyalty.

You may remember that former FBI director, James Comey, was asked for his loyalty to Trump exactly one week after the inauguration ceremony. According to people who know him well, Trump’s definition of loyalty is blunt. “Support Donald Trump in anything he says and does,” Roger Stone, the president’s longest-running political adviser, told me. “No matter what,” former Trump Organization executive Barbara Res said. “Or else,” added Louise Sunshine, a friend of Trump for nearly 50 years. “I think he defines it as allegiance,” biographer Tim O’Brien told me. “And it’s not allegiance to the flag or allegiance to the country—it’s allegiance to Trump.”


Donald Trump does not get along very well with many world leaders, but consider this fact. The man that he respects the most is a guy who used to run the KGB in Russia.


I’m not sure if that means that he is actually a mob boss, but I am of the opinion that it is the best description of the man who lost the 2016 presidential election by 3,000,000 votes, in spite of the help provided by his friend in Moscow.