Arizona
is the second-fastest growing state in the country, with a percent growth of
1.78%. Arizona’s population increased by 129,558 from 7,291,843 in 2019 to
7,421,401 in 2020. Arizona is attractive because of its sunny weather, good job
market, affordability, and a wide variety of entertainment options such as
festivals, museums, celebrity-owned restaurants, and more. Arizona also has the
Grand Canyon. Arizona is considered one of the states
with the best weather.
The Phoenix and Tucson metropolitan areas are seeing an explosion
in housing in recent years.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/fastest-growing-states
Not surprisingly, the fastest growing city in the entire
country is Buckeye, Arizona, which is a suburb of Phoenix
We live in an area that is close to the western border of
Tucson, and new houses are sprouting up like weeds, which leads me to wonder –
where is the water coming from to nourish all these new residents?
Contrary to what some pundits believe, global warming is NOT a
hoax. Globally, the 10 hottest years on record have occurred since 2005, and
the hottest year was 2016. All that heat has a strong negative influence on
water supply. In Arizona’s case, the bulk of our water comes from the Colorado
river, and Lake Mead is now 155 feet below its “full” level of 1229 feet, and
the picture below clearly shows the “bath tub ring” that shows the loss of
water.
https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.HhgtNCBSokIJo3l3Q6vEXQHaEK?w=333&h=187&c=7&o=5&pid=1.7
Since most of the Southwest is in either exceptional drought
or extreme drought conditions, the states in the Colorado river basin area are constantly
working on ways to limit water use.
http://mead.uslakes.info/level.asp
The Colorado River Compact of 1922 was signed by the 7 states
in the Colorado river basin, and it divided the watershed area into two areas.
The Upper Division includes the states of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and
Wyoming. The Lower Divisions includes Arizona, Nevada, and California.
Colorado was allocated slightly more than 50% of the water in
the Upper Division, and California was allocated slightly more than 50% of the
water in the Lower Division.
In 1934, Arizona, unhappy with
California's decision to dam and divert the river, called out the National
Guard and even commissioned a two-boat "navy." The matter was
eventually settled in court.
The agreement was controversial even
at the time, however. Arizona, for example, was dissatisfied with the lower
basin allotment. Led by Fred Colter, the state refused to sign the
agreement, and did not do so until two months after Colter's death in 1944.
The specific allotments were disputed
by Arizona until the United States
Supreme Court upheld the amount in the 1963 decision in Arizona v. California.
The agreement ended many years of dispute, clearing the way for the Central Arizona
Project, authorized by Congress in 1968 – though the Supreme Court
has been asked to readjust Arizona's water allocation a half-dozen times in the
interim. Mexico was able to gain some of the river rights, and Arizona took
steps as well to protect its water rights and keep California from gaining too
large of a share, which ultimately led to the Arizona v. California Supreme
Court case. The case lasted 11 years and cost over $5 million, requiring
the work product of over 50 lawyers. Based on an assumption that
California was using more than its contractually allotted water amount, Arizona
set the precedent of SCOTUS using water rights. The case ultimately decided
that the Boulder Canyon Provision was correct for the lower states (which are
California, Nevada, and Arizona). While the Court ultimately ruled in
favor of Arizona, it agreed with California's interpretation that how it
received surplus water supplies was correct.
The 7 states in the Colorado river basin
have implemented strategies to reduce water usage.
Several
years ago, the city of Los Angeles passed a law the rewarded homeowners who
replaced their lawns with desert landscaping – and my sister took advantage of
the new law, which transformed her lush green lawn into desert plants that
required little of no water.
Lawns
have long been rare in Tucson, and we have gotten so used to seeing gravel
instead of grass in years that green lawns, even outside businesses, look bizarre.
Since states in the Midwest are
losing population, and since states in the Southwest are gaining, it would seem
logical to purchase some of the water from Midwest States, and send it the Southwest
using a series of pipelines and canals.
The Great Lakes, of course, are not the source of water in the
Midwest.
The longest river in America is the Missouri River, which is
2341 miles long. The Mighty Mississippi, though, is not far behind, with a total
length of 2202 miles.
http://www.earthtimes.org/business/plan-divert-mississippi-flood-waters-west-proposed/1206/
Even before the Nevada board floated its idea, other people have
toyed with the idea of send Mississippi water out west, but there are two major
problems with either proposal.
One is cost.
A Colorado rancher and engineer named Gary Hausler calculated
that it would cost $23 billion to build. Although his idea does have merit, the
politicians that he talked with were not enthusiastic.
The other issue is time.
Mr. Hausler estimated that litigation related to the pipeline
would last 30 years, creating a bonanza for the attorneys on both sides of the argument,
and it would also result in the creation of new construction jobs, similar to
what happened on the Alaskan pipeline, when 21,000 jobs were added.
The link below provides a LOT more details on the pipeline, which
would be 775 miles long and 144 inches in diameter:
Since the U.S. Chamber of Commerce likes the idea of an East
to West pipeline, it does not mean that it won’t happen. It just means that it’s
not likely going to happen anytime in my lifetime - and I’m already 73.